Versions Compared

Old Version 121

changes.mady.by.user Ann Harding

Saved on

compared with

New Version 122

changes.mady.by.user Ann Harding

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Title

Two Factor (something)

Description

  • Drive two factor towards ubiquity with low cost - create an eduToken (for the users that do not have a phone; critical mass can bring down the price even more. It can be implemented as a kickstarter campaign).

    • Challenges in deploying multi-factor in EU, partially due to the costs and partially due to the cost involved. A cost-effective approach would help.

    • An edu-token  as  a separate ‘token’ may reintroduce token management aspects (losing the token etc)

    • management is (will be even more) a non issue as the majority of people will use phones. We should strike for that.

    • Technically this problem can be solved, taking the above considerations into account.
      The real problem is how to scale the token vetting over EU. This is especially challenging for research collaborations.
ProposerFrom data gathering exercise
Resource requirements<money? effort? coordination? infrastructure?>
+1's<for others to voice their support - add your name here>
-1'sWolfgang Pempe, DFN: I believe this is out of scope for GÉANT, you would need a dedicated organization for that purpose


Title

eduTEAMS and guest IdPs (actually Identity Assurance)

DescriptioneduTEAMS and guest IdPs - use-cases: need to support social IDs and guest IdP, but it need additional LoA. Step up authN as a service is in the plan
Proposerfrom data gathering exercise
Resource requirements<money? effort? coordination? infrastructure?>
+1's

isn't this the work being done in IoLR +REFEDS?

Some of it is - implementation in service contexts is not. It is expected any work in GEANT would do this, leaning on results from the above

...