The pilot has been closed, results can be found in the Deliverables section.
Duration: March 2014 - January 2015
Budget: 43.000 EUR - Actual expenses: 39.000 EUR
COLLECTION OF FINAL DELIVERABLES (PDF)
The OER pilot service becomes part of the GN4 project SA8 activity starting in April 2015.
Contents: | Contact details: TF-Media mailing list is at <tf-media@terena.org> The contact person for this activity is Peter Szegedi <szegedi@terena.org>
|
---|
...
More information is available in the pilot project description.
Deliverables
Documentation
First first DRAFTs:
- OER-Initial-Study-DRAFT-v1-IUCC.pdf
- OER-Initial-Study-Architecture-v1-GRNET.pdf
- OER-PR-plan-v1-FCT.pdf
- Aggregation engine statistics:
- Here you can find the aggregation workflow results visualized.
- Here you can find the statistical analysis results based on the final aggregated metadata.
- Here you can find the Rest API service offered by the repository.The Terena OER Portal could use it in order to visualize its results.
- Here you can find a simple web based client which sits on top of the API mentioned above.
...
- OER-Initial-Study-DRAFT-v2-IUCC.pdf
- OER-Initial-Study-Architecture-v2-GRNET.pdf
- TERENA-OER-AP-draft.pdf
- Aggregation engine oai-pmh target:
- Source for other harvesters here.
- Aggergation workflow for Content Providers http://terenaoer.grnet.gr:8082/doku.php
Additional documentation:
- OER data issues by Vicente https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GXTaY1g-hLB_ySXC9sMwHruwzEhYfR5x88fquFuvy-c/edit?pli=1
...
Back-end engine statistics
- http://terenaoer.grnet.gr/index.html#/dashboard/elasticsearch/Terena%20Aggregation
- http://terenaoer.grnet.gr/index.html#/dashboard/elasticsearch/Terena%20Metadata%20Analysis
- http://terenaoer.grnet.gr/index.html#/dashboard/elasticsearch/ES_Access_Stats : grnet/grnet
Fronf-end portal (demonstrator)
...
Anchor | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
1st meeting - 1st meeting - 28 March 2014 @ 10.00 CET
2nd meeting - 2 April 2014 @ 10.00 CEST
...
Anchor | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Note | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
|
...
Participants: Eli, Vicente, Kostas, Adam, Peter Notes 1) Kostas showed the statisitcal interface of the back-end.
2) Vicente showed the front-endportal.
Adam explained the vocabulary that Videotorim use for the subject element: http://videotorium.hu/en/categories
3) Peter elaborated on the next steps
Everyones' efforts and hard work are very much appreciated! |
Anchor | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Note | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Recording: Notes: As we commented during the last meeting (19th Jan) I consider the development of Geant-OER Portal done. We are currently doing tests and QA on it. Any help testing the portal and trying to find bugs is very welcome. You will find it here: Please, try it and send any bug reports to this list. Open Issues:
Comments from Giannis:
Promotion examples from Nelson I’m sending this email with some of the communication examples you asked me to create during the last year. You can see attached 3 different posters in A4 format that can be used to promote the service around the world, mainly to our main target, the NREN’s. 3 Key Messages: 1- Are you ready for open education? 2- Are you ready to connect to the Géant OER? 3- Are you ready to publish your content with open licenses?
These examples can be easily promoted by email, newsletters or as a printed version in conferences and institutional events. I think it would be important to create a strong corporate identity (name, logo, slogan), before the project release as I wrote in the communication proposal. In my point of view these elements will be the key to promote the service and to engage users with our brand(Géant OER). I think they should be created and included in the different promotional channels since the beginning of communication process. A4_Are_you_ready_for_open_education.pdf A4_Are_you_ready_to_connect_to_the_Géant_OER.pdf A4_Are_you_ready_to_connect_to_the_Géant_OER.pdf
|
...
Note | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Recording: Notes: As we commented during the last meeting (19th Jan) I consider the development of Geant-OER Portal done. We are currently doing tests and QA on it. Any help testing the portal and trying to find bugs is very welcome. You will find it here: Please, try it and send any bug reports to this list. Open Issues:
Comments from Giannis: |
Anchor | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Note | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Participating: Peter, Kostas,Vicente, Eduardo, Giannis, Eli
Agenda: 1. Summary/Update - Current Status 2. Focus on the Content, Functionality 3. Update on the back-end engine 4. Front and back end interaction 5. Timeline
- - - 1. Current Status Vicente: working mainly on data structure, adapting the PUMUKIT structure to the application profile working on the import scripts - not as straightforward as expected; modifying the scripts all the time - related to the structure and the vocabulary [demonstrates JSON file example: issues with specific fields, supposed values, file formats do not match - need a translation at an aggregation level, media format doesn’t appear, strange language codes - or appear to be English, but isn’t - language codes should be translated, lack of numeric codes, etc.] - issued needed to be solved in order to get good data Peter: problems related to the metadata translation - should be translated into one format or schema Vicente: some issued should be fixed at the repository level Peter: proper translation needed, metadata not exposed by local repositories - a) ask them to change that, b) try to translate it automatically will have to tackle that later on Vicente: our own repositories - improving the data exposed in order to make it easy to harvest, but data coming from iTunesu - cannot count on cooperation with the data provider; translation should be done at the repository level we have all the tools, just need to focus on improving the harvesting process Peter: can compare the local repository and the one harvested - enough for us to prove that it will work Kostas: the phase of transformation is problematic, we don’t know what are the elements used from others’ perspective, might have problems with mapping the local elements with the elements of TERENA OER Peter: thumbnail gets lost for example; need to look for the basic fields we agreed on Kostas: last time we were harvesting there were no thumbnails Vicente: part of the collection, not of the item, but we are not working with collections now Kostas: could harvest information where thumbnail is a part of the item Vicente: need to interact more to solve minor issues Kostas: send me the list of issues
Vicente: regarding the portal - some objects have been harvested, currently the URL exposed is not the direct URL to the media, but the player page (can be changed) categories, filters search - first implementation information available at provider level, possible to harvest it
2. Focus on Functionality Peter: functions need to work, else the end-users will leave, if something doesn’t work, should not be on the pilot version; ok to put new features in as they become functional Vicente: this is work in progress, users wont be exposed to anything that won’t be working, functionalities there for demonstration purposes only, will be removed
- - -
Peter: Kostas, once the translation is done, others will work or are there differences? Kostas: main issue is translation, has to be done together with Vicente and his team Peter: scalability of this process in the future - tedious manual approach for now for every repository; next repository will have to be treated the same? doesn’t seem scalable Kostas: difficult to create a transformation file for every provider, will take time Giannis: the first version is for the internal consumption, but later it will be important to communicate to the data providers willing to join Vicente: maybe institutions willing to do what is needed, but might not; or we can learn to harvest the apple feeds properly Peter: would not fixate too much on the apple one, we want to connect different sources Giannis: need to have some educational metadata, else we will just replicate the iTunes harvesting mechanism; need to understand the semantics of the metadata - main problem, else can be corrected
ACTION: Vicente to send a detailed list of issues to Kostas
Eli: need to see how many hours Kostas will need for every repository 5-10 hours - worth it, else need to consider
Giannis: either remove the subject from the front end, or not use metadata that has no subject element - will apply to many elements
Eli: if we will see that we need more go arounds to fix something, maybe we can discuss the technology aspects in the next phase Peter: we will have development time in the next phase (GN4, April next year) - Kostas will be spending a lot of time working on it
- - -
Timeline
Peter: one more meeting before holidays or better in January? Can also follow up individually - (will be back on 5 January)
Giannis: specific collections from the iTunes site - who is responsible for those collections? Peter: iTunesU was identified as an escape for now, but need to focus on the local repositories - everyone in their own countries should look for it, happy to do that in the Netherlands (also need to address the language question later) Giannis: i will look for Greek collections Peter: next meeting in January
Software fixes by Kostas
|
...