The focus for this kick-off call was on the prepared mapping of OpenID to the current SAML Technical Profile: OpenID Technical Profile Mapping. 

Issues identified in the call: 

• Current Metadata Aggregation Practice Statement might be better renamed Metadata Management Practice Statement and could be aligned across both approaches. 
• Need to agree on a consistent naming process - OIDFed is proposed. 
• Metadata Registration Practice Statement should be registration and publication statement and needs to be machine readable. These rules MUST be consistent at the eduGAIN level (not the case for SAML). 
• Scope is an issue in OIDFed world - require the fedop run a TrustMark Issuer that makes "scope" statments about OPs?
• If policies are machine readable statements published in trust anchor, how do we enforce them?

Notes: some of the areas of work might be done via extensions as well as Trust Marks. If we do an extension, we need to do a spec!

Currently look at metadata.  Need to have a discussion on the trust model.  Attributes and claims not currently in the spec - specifically how we e