In the last GeGC meeting there was an action item to refine what a Confederation is for the GeGC.
A proposed definition in a draft ToR that the last GeGC provided as input to the 3rd GeGC is attached:gegc-charter-v2.pdf and available for comment online: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Jk8OiVsQrTAX7j-7iszgoPZ7E3sD_5cjzaWJK7W4lno/edit.
The ToR version was drafted with some previous work from Neil as well as input from many others.
Neil's previous input can be seen here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1F6pTtxx045ijrQoQl3jNksm0Mk5eIFKf0qW07prpkCY/edit?usp=sharing
To move things forward, I propose that :
Q1. What does it mean to be 'a cohesive set' in the context of a confederation?
Ans: While geography plays a significant role, a cohesive set may be defined by language, culture or other intent that a roaming operator can align with other operators.
e.g. One Regional Operator may geographically be close to confederation but that confederation uses a different core language for all it's operation/curation of the eduroam service
NOTE: Feb 22: see latest google doc for this being part of the definition.
Q2. Does a confederation automatically get representation on the GeGC?
Ans: (to be discussed) Potentially and may be require certain qualities (e.g. number of members or material differences in composition)
Q3. Is there a confederation for commercial entities which have research arms to their organization?
Ans: Not at this time. Any commercial entities regardless of confederation alignment (or not) must abide by the R/O policies and the eduroam Policy Statement.
Q4. When a Regional Operator is voted to be 'in eduroam', must they be part of a confederation or region?
Ans: No, not at this time. They may be on their own by their own choosing. An R/O may desire to join a confederation, but the confederation must accept to represent them as well.