Date
Attendees
Apologies
Goals
- Review the eduKEEP project plan
- Discuss the tastks and the assignments
- Check assignees availability for next immediate actions and tasks
Discussion items
| Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| eduKEEP project plan | Davide Vaghetti | Davide shared the workplan draft. | |
| 35min | task "Develop ansible playbooks for architectures deployment (toolkit)" | Rolf queried if it's worth the effort on development of Ansible playbooks and if this was specific to the IdP. Davide noted that in order for the pilot to run a means of deploying the infrastructure is required to avoid barriers in adoption (making it as easy as possible for participants to adopt). The Ansible would be for the IdP and core components. A mock attribute authority could also be created. Rolf: Would Ansible playbooks be made for all four architectures identified? Davide suggests just 2: eduID (Central IdP) and Account Linking/Proxy based. Rolf warns it would be difficult to make a playbook for the eduID, and would need buy-in from SWITCH. The service is distributed over several hosts and is quite specific to the SWITCH use-case; difficult to make generic. Davide: in the CampusIDP task an Ansible playbook is being created to deploy Shibboleth IDPs, we can also leverage existing solutions from many NRENS (GARR, CESNET, RENATER at least). Rolf: for the pilot, could alternatively develop a single instance that pilot participants could connect their own infrastructures to, rather than each participant deploying an infrastructure at their end. Davide: the single instance solution in that case should be multi-tenant. Justin: should we develop just a reference architecture? Or aim more ambitiously with the playbooks that pilot participants can use? The latter helps to remove barriers to adoption and demonstrates proving the concept, but is a higher workload. Davide: we have also another option, instead of producing playbooks, the task could offer just the reference architecture and assistance from task members for pilot participants to deploy it, but probably the effort would be bigger. Key next step is to nail down and all agree on the scope of the task. Rolf will have a talk with Ann in the first case | |
| 15min | Other comments on the plan | Constantin: should we also specify migration strategies to the user-driven approach? (for the pilot) Justin: try to propose migration in the pilot would be unbearable Hervé: eduKEEP concept itself has to be better defined, use cases can help |
Action items
- Karl Meyer and Davide Vaghetti will prepare TNC17 lightning talk submission — the deadline for submission is
- Hervé BOURGAULT, Sclifos Constantin and Rolf Brugger will start working on use cases: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_wfL3EmcSxQZzGutv2n3W_Kzxv1Xidu5gO_Jld0ypXY— end of task is
- Rolf Brugger will check with Ann to be sure we are on the right track for task scope.