You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

This is the start of a breakdown to look at what policy changes will be needed for eduGAIN in order to introduce OpenID Federation into the eduGAIN framework.  


Current Section of SAML Technical ProfilePurposeReferencesOpenID InterpretationNotes 

Overview

General overview of the document but framed in SAML language 

Operational Practice Statement for SAML: Operational Practice Statement - SAML profile

Metadata Aggregation Practice Statement for SAML: Metadata Aggregation Practice Statement

eduGAIN Best Current Practice as a SHOULD (CoCo, Sirtfi, R&S). 



Metadata Registration Practice Statement

Information on expectations on how an entity can be registered into a federation metadata stream

Metadata Registration Practice Statement


ShibMD for scope information


Current reliance on a non-machine readable document and we do not have any strong requirements over what is included, this is left to federations to describe local practice.  Does this still meet objectives or is another approach required? Note it is only a template, not a set of standards / requirements. 

Current MRPS only speaks to SAML requirements. 

SAML Metadata Production

Basic requirements on how federation metadata is formed and minimum standards for the metadata published by the federation

eduGAIN Metadata Aggregation Practice Statement

md / mdui  / mdrpi


Has some requirements for the overall federation metadata and also places some requirements on information about individual entities although the current focus is on information about the organisation and its identity. Would additional items (e.g. privacy notice, security contact) sit here?

SAML Metadata Signing


SAML V2.0 Metadata Interoperability Profile Version 1.0

Metadata for the OASIS Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) V2.0

eduGAIN Metadata Aggregation Practice Statement



SAML Metadata Publication

Information on how metadata should be published back to entities by federations and how it should be consumed


Participant Federation Requirements

Basic how of registering the metadata setmdrpi for registrationauthority

Adherence

Process for monitoring and addressing non-compliance with the requirements set out

What would this look like for OIDC? 

Mandatory Entity Requirements

This does not currently exist but the suggestion of introducing a privacy statement and Sirtfi as mandatory requirements would require this to be added.  Should this be part of the metadata production requirements or separate? 


  • No labels